Lamb, M. E., & Gilbride, K. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). When the I am not saying hot, will you be gorgeous or perhaps not?: Physical-attractiveness evaluations and you can relationship choices because a purpose of an individual’s individual appeal. Psychological Science, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other personal relationships. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible matchmaking (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of ambition. Inside the J. McV. Look (Ed.), Identity and also the decisions problems (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Anticipating relationship matchmaking destiny having insiders’ and outsiders’ angle: Just who and you may what’s requested things. Individual Relationships, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality during the newly weds: Several depending strategy. Diary away from Identity and Societal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Legitimizing affairs regarding initiation off heterosexual relationships
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, Good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. Roentgen. (2006). Thought resemblance and you will matchmaking triumph among relationship lovers: An enthusiastic idiographic method. Record of Social and private Matchmaking, 23, 865-880. [ Backlinks ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An excellent. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Report with the Pew Internet & American Life Venture. Recovered , out of [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Assessing the precision regarding forecasts on the matchmaking matchmaking: How and why carry out lovers’ forecasts change from men and women from observers? Character and Social Therapy Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Website links ]
The newest appeal-similarity hypothesis certainly one of cross-intercourse family unit members: Relationships fulfillment, thought of parallels, and you will notice-providing thinking
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers presented on Earliest Globally Conference towards Personal Dating, Madison, WI. [ Backlinks ]
Merkle, E.R., & Richardson, R.A good. (2000). Electronic dating and you can virtual appropriate: Conceptualizing computers mediated romantic dating. Household members, forty-two, 187-192. [ Links ]
Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance very important to appeal? A great meta-research away from real and you will thought of resemblance. Record off Personal and private Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Morry, M. M https://datingmentor.org/fabswingers-review/. (2005). Dating satisfaction since the a predictor from similarity evaluations; A test of your interest-similarity theory. Log out of Personal and personal Relationships, twenty two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you can expansion of SVR principle regarding dyadic pairing. Diary out-of ily, 44, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: An excellent fourteen-season longitudinal examination of black colored couples and you will light partners. Record off Societal and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The new like algorithm Suits thinks it offers discover an algorithm having ruling the web based relationship organization: A scientific way to find Mr. or Ms. Right. Organization 2.0 Magazine. Retrieved into the out-of [ Backlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Personality parallels within the couples. Identification and you will Individual Distinctions, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner needs: Exactly what features carry out everyone appeal in their small-title sexual and you will long-term romantic partners? Record from Mindset and you may Peoples Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh part of the mind from the initiation and you may course of social correspondence. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict dating (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Leave a Reply